Genre Lit Fic
Jul. 26th, 2007 09:37 amClearly, it's being marketed as Not Science Fiction. But review makes it sound like the more the book explores genre, the more literary it is. I'm left with this weird conclusion that exploring genre "within its traditional limits" is literary. Well, if the review insists. (But this makes me wonder is there any writing within genre then that isn't also literary?)
I feel like instead of categorizing books, we ought to be tagging them instead. If someone thinks of a book as literary fiction, that shouldn't mean it can't also be genre fiction at the same time. And the review shouldn't give the impression that this is taking something from the realm of children and making it appropriate for adults. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 08:10 pm (UTC)I agree with your two stated answers to this, but I'd also add that there are plenty of gateway texts.
Some of them are not-so-well written genre titles. From the reviews I've read, people who hadn't read Tolkien or even Terry Brooks, especially if they were youngsters, didn't mind the cliches in Eragon.
Some of the gateway texts are Not Science Fiction / Not Fantasy titles by writers who are using second or third-generation versions of the genre tropes, rather than the Peter Watts / Charlie Stross / Elizabeth Bear-type who is using the post-Singularity version. So, in this way, NSF/NF might actually bring readers into the genre, if they aren't already so prejudiced against books with rockets or dragons on the covers.
(Maybe we should talk about fixing the book covers, too.)